Not so happy

Liked: The room was spacious and clean.
Disliked: LocationThe bed was uncomfortable for meAs a senior citizen, the steps up to the 2nd floor from the parking lot were very hard to navigate.

Exceptional

Okay for a low cost...

Liked: Clean, Very dated. Safe and secure.
Disliked: Unfortunately a guest below left a barking dog around 9:30 pm for 2 hours.

Once you get past front...

Liked: Nice property and nice location . Gas station super close for snack run
Disliked: Front desk is rude. No breakfast and minimum selection snacks.

Very good

nice place to stay. There's...

Liked: I thought the room was nice. Nice bed decorations. the heat was comfy. pretty good tv selection w/hbo tbs etc.
Disliked: The floor could be replaced it was worn in many spots, the shower wall had a 3 foot long crack that was patched up. there was no coffee pot.

Horrible

Liked: No breakfast and the location was loud and the property was filthy with garbage all over
Disliked: No phone it was broken, no alarm clock,the beds were not comfortable at all, the walls were rotted , they do not clean their rooms. I watched them strip the rooms and leave that was it! The term 'pet-friendly' in motels and hotels is deceptive, as it appears to be a way to charge extra fees without providing adequate services. My recent experiences at two establishments that claimed to be pet-friendly revealed that the rooms were no cleaner than when I arrived, despite my efforts to maintain a clean environment. If a motel is truly pet-friendly, it should prioritize accommodating pets, not enabling illicit activities. I propose that guests who create messes be charged accordingly, rather than imposing cleaning fees on responsible pet owners. My animals are cleaner than the rooms themselves, and I should be reimbursed for the effort and expense of cleaning and disinfecting everything, including the rooms, which the staff only partially clean.

Passable

Bad