Best Western Beacon Inn Guest Reviews
Write a review
2.0 miles from Grand Haven centre |
Write a review
Mander Mon, 14 April 2025
Very good
Liked: Location
Disliked: Hard bed and squishy pillows
Alexis Thu, 3 April 2025
Superb
Robert Wed, 2 April 2025
For the price better than...
Liked: Clean and comfortable. Staff was very friendly and helpful.
Alexander Sun, 23 March 2025
Disappointing
Liked: Location is great
Disliked: The ice all over outside in front of the door. And I never received my deposit back.
Alyssa Mon, 17 March 2025
Our stay was enjoyable and...
Liked: The property is beautiful. We opted for a room with a Jacuzzi tub in the room which was an incredible amenity to enjoy. Establishments near by were also enjoyable for dining etc
Disliked: When we arrived our tv in our room was broken. It took a little bit but staff was able to swap it out with another one.
Ryan Sat, 8 March 2025
Exceptional
Jamison Wed, 5 March 2025
Terrible
Disliked: I made this booking for my girlfriend, I was out of state and could not be with her. She arrived and instead of being put in the hotel that I saw in all pics and websites, she was put in an exterior separate section of the hotel ( problem #1). Then problem #2 was it was dark in the parking lot, and that unsettled her. Problem #3 and the worst thing was there was a man in grubby clothes that was standing right at her door smoking and just hanging out. She waited a while and he just stayed there, she was very nervous and unsettled by it all, so I told her to leave. She ended up driving back home late at night because of the whole situation.Your reviews looked good, and what I guess is the main hotel looked nice, so I booked it.
Samir Wed, 5 March 2025
Very good
Nancy Mon, 3 March 2025
Disappointing
Disliked: toilet leaked.both tubs drained very slow
Linda Sat, 22 February 2025
Will be back - with...
Liked: Quality room set up, cleanliness, atmosphere quiet, value for the money.
Disliked: The in room coffee maker did not work. I am up early8 and the coffee machine downstairs was not ‘on’ yet.